By 629752_pvfm3x 
Arguments towards Copernicus: I have already shewn you what he hath written touching these new Stars in his Anti-Tycho, the place he denied not, however that they have been within the Heavens; but he proved, that their production altered not the inalterability of the Heavens, and that he did, with a Discourse purely philosophical, in the identical man¦ner as you have got already heard. And that i then forgot to let you know, how that he afterwards did finde out a approach to remove them out of the Heavens; for he proceeding on this confutation, by the use of computations and parallaxes, matters little or nothing in any respect understood by me, I did not point out them to you, however have bent all my research upon these arguments against the movement of the Earth, that are purely pure. And perhaps the extra stable and material bodies, as birds, (for there would in all probability be a lot of them scattered up and down within the air) would retire more towards the centre of the great vacant sphere; (for it seemeth very reasonable, that substances that below small bulk comprise much matter, should have narrower places assigned them, leaving the more spacious to the extra ra•ified) and there being dead of starvation, and resolved into Earth, would form a new little Globe, with that little water, which at the moment was among the many clouds.
The nice maß of grave our bodies being transferred out of their place, the separated components would observe that maß. And subsequently I hold, that within the Cave full of air, the whole Vault would press, and violently rest it self onely upon that air, in case its hardness could not be overcome and damaged by its gravity; but free stones, I consider, would descend to the centre, and never swim above within the air: nor could it be said, that they move not to their entire, although they move whither all of the parts of the whole would transfer themselves, if all impediments have been removed. The stone positioned in the centre, either ascendeth to the Earth in some point, or no. If the second, it’s false that the components separated from the whole, transfer unto it. Now this Discourse being applied to the revolution of the Earth, and to the stone positioned in the highest of the Tower, through which you can’t discern any motion, because that you have that movement which is important for the next of it, in frequent with it from the Earth; so that you just want not transfer your eye.
Beware of your individual anger at being placed on the spot — this might create microexpressions of contempt or rage. He completely exasperated her, and she would, you understand, fly into a rage and pack up and go away.And so he repeatedly abused my sister and me between the ages of eight and 11. I used to be left to provide him dinner and put him to mattress. But then a wave of nerves washed over her, plus a question: What now? And if these items befall in issues not pure, and in issues that we might experiment of their state of rest; & then once more in the opposite state of movement, and but as to appearance no diversity at all is discovered, & that they seem to deceive our sense what can we distinguish touching the Earth, which hath been perpetually in the same structure, as to movement and relaxation? Northeast, one other whereas towards the Southeast; others bearing her up by the Carine might make her onely to rise, and fall; and in sum, these motions are for species two, one that changeth the path of the Telescope angularly, the opposite lineally, with out changing angle, that is, alwayes preserving the tube of the Instrument parallel to its self.