By 629752_pvfm3x 
That nature in issues needed is neither defective, nor superfluous.Flexures necessary in animals for the diversity of their motions. You first admit it for true, that Nature hath made the joynts, flexures, and knuckles of living creatures, to the intent that they could move with sundry and divers motions; and i deny this proposition; and say, that these flexions are made, that the animal might transfer one, or extra of its elements,The Flexures in animals usually are not made for the variety of motions. I say, that as to the species and differences of motions those are of one sort alone, to wit, all circular, and for this trigger you see all the ends of the moveable bones to be convex or concave,The motions of animals are of one kind. The ends of the bones are all rotund. Ensigne doth, in displaying the Colours, and that of the Falconer in bringing his Hawk to the lure; and such is the flexure of the elbow, upon which the hand turns spherical, in boring with an augure: others are circular onely a method, and as it have been cylindrical, which serve for the members that bend onely in one fashion,It is demonstrated, that the ends of the bones are of necessity to be rotund.
However the mutation to the appropriate hand or left, forwards or backwards, upwards or downwards, bringeth no sensible impediment within the kenning of objects remote, although the alteration of the angle maketh great change therein; Therefore it must of necessity be confessed, that the use of the Telescope on the round high is no more difficult than upon the Deck on the Partners; seeing that the angular mutations are alike in both places. Burano, six miles from therefore, do flip it angularly to the best hand, or to the left, or else upwards or downwards, but a †† Vn nero d’ ugna, the black or paring of a nail. Sagr.But if without altering the angle, protecting the tube alwayes parallel to it self, we should transfer it ten or twelve yards farther off to the right or left hand, upwards or downwards, what alteration would it not make as to the Tower? And thus additionally I will excuse those Philosophers, who grow impatient and fly out into passion towards resembling won’t grant them, that that Cannon bullet which they cleerly see to fall in a proper line perpendicularly, doth completely transfer in that method; however will have its movement to be by an arch, and likewise very much inclined and transversal: however let us depart them in these labyrinths, and allow us to hear the other objections, that our Author in hand brings in opposition to Copernicus.
The sky out there is wonderful.. Salv.The change could be completely undiscernable; for that the areas right here and there being contained between parallel rayes, the mutations made right here and there, must be equal, and since the space which the Instrument discovers yonder, is capable of a lot of those Towers; therefore we shall not lose sight of it. It’s true, that by the other senses, but yet assisted by Reason,The boats movement is perceptible to the sight joyn’d with reason. Simpl.The Author goeth on to reveal that within the Doctrine of Copernicus, it is requisite to deny the Senses, and the greatest Sensations,The annual motion of the Earth should cause a perpetual and strong winde. Salv.But I need not to deduce precepts more worthwhile, or more certain, learning to be extra circumspect and less confident about that which at first blush is represented to us by the senses, which can easily deceive us. And that it may be exterior, the experiment of the boat superabundantly satisfieth me; I say, superabundantly, because it being in our power at all times to make it transfer, and in addition to make it stand nonetheless, and with nice exactness to make commentary, whether by some diversity that could be comprehended by the sense of feeling, we are able to come to know whether or not it moveth or no, seeing that as but no such science is obtained: Will it then be any matter of surprise, if the identical accident is unknown to us on the Earth, the which may have carried us about perpetually, and we, without our being ever able to experiment its rest?
This Gentleman forgot, that we no lower than the Earth and air are carried about, and that consequently we’re always contact’d by one and the same a part of the air, which but doth not make us feel it. From these items the argument is taken against the threefold movement of the Earth. Now allow us to see what you’ve got farther to allege on this argument. You see now how craftily he falls upon your answer, as if he had foreseen it. I cannot at this time with out want inlarge upon it; and so much the reasonably, because the same Author hath furnished me with an answer, when he saith that from one sole prinple in animals, there are produced divers operations; in order that for the current my reply shall be, that in the same method the Earth from one onely principle deriveth several operations. And that is manifest, not onely in issues which can be moved by an extrinsick mover; but it’s gathered additionally from the rules propounded, that the same holdeth true within the natural motion dependent on an intrinsick principle; otherwise, being that the mover, as a mover, is the cause, and the thing moved, as moved, is the effect, the same factor would completely be each the trigger and effect.